Up: Martin Poulter > Scientology Criticism > UK Media Archive
Scientologist's Court Case Thrown Out By Magistrates
UK Press Gazette (UKPG) 25 September 1995
by Nicola Methven
"It's a real victory for journalists doing their job in the interest of the public, and a victory against pressure groups like the Church of Scientology."
- Alison Braund.
BIG STORY journalist Alison Braund has hailed a court victory over the Church of Scientology as a boost to investigative journalism.
City of London magistrates dismissed private prosecutions for theft brought by the Scientologists against Braund, producer Claudia Milne and Twenty Twenty Television as an abuse of process.
An attempt to ban the programme was refused by the Attorney General (UKPG 17 July).
Braund said afterward: "Its a great decision. Its a real victory for journalists doing their job in the interest of the public, and a victory against pressure groups like the Church of Scientology, who harass people through the courts. I shall carry on investigating.
We did follow ITC guidelines and, for the integrity of myself, Twenty Twenty and Carlton, it's great.
The Church had accused the programme makers of having obtained entry to two of its courses dishonestly, and of trespass to goods.
In May, Braund went undercover and enrolled for scientology courses in order to film for the programme, entitled Inside the Cult.
The court heard that the church suspected she was an undercover journalist and sought to entrap her by leaving documents, marked highly confidential, around. Braund took them and was consequently arrested for theft.
The police and Crown Prosecution Service considered the case but took no further action.
The chairman of the magistrates, Hinda Style, said: The actions of the prosecution pre-empted the decision of the CPS, and the taking out of summonses was oppressive.
Representing the defendants, Peter Thornton said: The proceedings are tainted by the ulterior motives of trying to prevent the broadcast, punishing and embarrassing the defendants, and dissuading other journalists and programme makers from publishing any other material critical of the Church of Scientology.
He also submitted that dishonesty was not involved in the accepted sense. He told the court that the cult being secretly filmed by Braund, using a camera concealed in her spectacles, involved hypnotic elements, brainwashing and taking money.
Costs of 15,410.31 were awarded against the prosecution. The Church is considering appealing the magistrate's decision. A Church spokesman said that the programme was "cynically calculated" and had ignored information which it had provided.
Up: Martin Poulter > Scientology Criticism > UK Media Archive